Should I stay or should I go?
This weekend, the Congress of the University and College Union (UCU), the main trade union for UK academics, passed a motion which called on the UK government to stop arming Ukraine and noted that Zelensky aimed to make Ukraine ‘an armed, illiberal outpost of US imperialism’.
Predictably, this was controversial, many resigning from the union. I will be the last to criticize these people. Over the years, UCU has become a byword for the authoritarian and regressive left. There is a longstanding problem with anti-Semitism, the union proposing the commemoration of Holocaust Memorial Day without mention of the Jews. UCU’s record on academic freedom is poor; Sussex activists drove gender critical philosopher Kathleen Stock from her job.
For the moment, I will not resign, my dilemma enabling reflection on the past and future trajectories of the left. The case of UCU evokes historic developments in the Labour Party. In 2019, I resigned from the party over the Corbyn leadership – like supporters of the UCU motion, Corbyn was associated with the illiberal Stop the War movement – and voted for the Liberal Democrats in the 2019 general election. I was sympathetic to the Labour MPs who formed the breakaway Change UK, urging others to join them.
This position may have aged poorly. The Corbyn years felt like the deepest nadir, but turned out to be a medium-term defeat, moderates recovering the party. I continue to be disturbed by the extent of Keir Starmer’s involvement in Corbynism – to a degree which others were not, he was central to it – but cannot find much fault with those moderates who stayed on the backbenches. Had these people resigned during the Corbyn years, a moderate Labour Party would never have achieved its current position, comfortably leading the Conservative Party and marginalizing the hard left. Significantly, many Change UK members have rejoined the Labour Party.
This experience informs my attitude towards UCU. There is talk of the formation of a moderate union, yet it is difficult to believe that anything will come of this; start-up costs are too high. In these circumstances, it may be better to stay and fight. As many have remarked, resignation cedes further ground to extremists.
There are important differences between parties and unions. Despite their malevolence, UCU militants have tiny public influence. By contrast, Jeremy Corbyn almost became prime minister. Both sides can appeal to this difference – some who remained in Labour did so with the aim of restraining Corbyn – but I thought (and still think) that the need to stop Corbyn necessitated unequivocal action.
In the event of industrial action, resignation from UCU requires one to cross a picket line. I would not rule this out (see below), but am extremely reluctant to do so. In a way that voting for another party does not, crossing a picket line undermines workers’ rights.
Yet this begs the question; in which circumstances would I resign? If I would never do this, it hands carte blanche to my opponents. ‘Stay and fight’ can become a parody of itself. If there is no chance of a foul and offensive union ever changing – and many would argue this point has been reached – it is better to resign; to some extent, membership involves endorsement of the union as a whole.
Of course, ‘staying and fighting’ entails fighting! Today on Twitter, someone asked me to act as a Cardiff University delegate at next year’s Congress. Apparently, Cardiff UCU sent a mere two delegates to this year’s event (out of a possible six). I may become more involved in my branch, but family and work duties preclude greater commitment. Moreover, I do not wish to spend time arguing with people, involvement in such disputes being scarring.
Other moderates feel like this. Being brutally honest, this may be the crux of the problem.
If you enjoyed reading this, do think about subscribing! Subscription is free – all it means is that you’ll receive a weekly email. But every new subscriber makes me very happy 😊 😊 😊
I very much understand the dilemma you face, and it’s one I have faced with regard to several organisations I have been a long-time member of lately. On the one hand, you watch an institution you used to trust and admire become regressive (all the while congratulating itself for being so progressive). Frankly it feels like the institution has been hollowed out from within, to be a shell of its former self. On the other hand, if you leave - and everyone else like you leaves - then this leaves the organisation in the hands of sharply polarised and polarising people. I am lucky with the NTEU - while it has issues like every academic union seems to these days - it has in the past defended academic members who hold views in opposition to the union’s general approach (I’m thinking of Ridd v JCU, which went to the High Court). So, for the moment, I am staying, for the reasons you identify. I think that solidarity to improve working conditions is very important: I was brought up with a old-style Labor approach. I also think there is something *really* wrong with the way in which academic hiring and incentives operate (as you may guess). But I can’t take a more active role than I already do, like you, because of my family, but also because my health is not good (i.e. hospitalised at least once a year, every year, for operations or pneumonia or asthma over the last 15 years, constant medical treatment required to keep me off walking stick/crutches). It’s all I can do to keep doing my normal duties without falling ill. And the core of what I am is a teacher: that is what matters most.
Thomas, you are not going to win from within. You would be shouted down in an instant. This particular brand of Lefyness is a cult. They have built a religion. Nobody will carefully consider an alternative opinion. It is not like Substack. Heterodoxy in such arenas as you find yourself is proscribed.
There is another angle; in the 1980's I refused to join the NUJ even though I was offered membership by a senior member. I refused because of the criminality with which the union conducted itself and the absurd working practices. They were in cahoots with the print unions. It was a closed shop then which to my mind was an anathema. I may as well signed up to National Socialism. There were a few of us. Bill Bryson, the author, was one and his reasons were pretty much what mine were. You say you have family commitments. That is very important and you can do far more to get good Karma than you ever would by attracting a lot of haters. And besides you must be careful. An American academic, a senior nurse and contributor to some very helpful research lost her career for simply saying 'all lives matter' at the wrong point in history in the wrong place. https://titusarrius.substack.com/p/the-real-neo-mccarthyism.
And if there is the slightest smell of antisemitism, I would be out the door.
There is nothing you can say or do that will influence these people. Why subject yourself?